W.C. FORM 2.
unwilling to express an opinion
until they know the vecs
of
the local nasil & military or thaitian
The Admiralty have just
from the Naval l-in-la
that le
saying
Le regards
the mito
as a suitable one
and that the
e aprees. Ipresume therefore
0.0.0
that the O.D.C, to when I have referred the mather grain, would approve from a defence faint
oporcio.
to Ad
Admiralty.
lette of 22th July
propert
refers to
in this paper is a new
altogether, and appear to have bean vent to you
by the Contracts Branch at the Admirally without the knowledge of the operations & Defence Branches. These opoken to the latter, who have
acked me
that
20
to oeffent
to you action should be taken
until they have communested
File No.
Minute Sheet.
Page
37
with me pain. Iouill let you
knowas
fear ther
10.8.20
Shear any thing 2.4.6.
The wait
Bis feorge Fiddes.
This question has been considered by the Rose Defence Committee.
a.
The Comme the are
of opinion that, froin
defence point of view, there is no objection to the exection by the Anglo-Persian bil
oil-fuel installation on. the mainland at Hong Kong a site to the comediate East of the Coaling depot and Raval yard.
Company of an oil-fuel
At the name time, the Committes would like to point out that there is nothing the documents before them to show why. quantity of oil the Explo-Resian but Company
205). Wt. 37,812-64. 6000. 12/18. Gp.184. A&E,W.
[P. T. Over.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.